1.
I participated in the Cystic Fibrosis Fundraiser
and Climb. My role was to help with the
tabling and make the flyers. I also went
to the climb.
2.
Pros: getting to feel like you’re a part of
something bigger, thinking about someone else for a change, getting out of the
classroom, building “team spirit”, learning more about cooperation,
strengthening our planning skills, having fun!
Cons: it did use up some class time we
could have spent on something else.
3.
I learned that it’s really important to be clear
when explaining an issue. When we were
tabling, some people were really confused when we tried to tell them what we
were doing. How we explained cystic
fibrosis often made a difference in how people reacted (i.e. if they gave us
money…). I also learned that bureaucracy
is hard to penetrate. When we tried to
get food to sell to earn the money, there were lots of nit-picky things that
the different businesses came up with as reasons to tell us no. Sometimes
people genuinely wanted to help but couldn’t because of various bureaucratic
provisions. I also learned that even
though what we did felt small, it multiplied into something big because of the
great advertising and PR for the entire event.
Seeing how difficult earning our money was gave me a greater
appreciation for what the organizers of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation do. I can’t imagine how much work it would be to
put on the whole event.
4.
I learned that NGOs (Non-Governmental
Organizations) have very talented people working for them. They are able to get corporations to sponsor
them and donate lots of money by clever advertising and public relations in
general. I also learned that a fair
amount of money gets spent on things not directly related to the cause—for example,
salaries, and things to make the events flashier like food and t-shirts. There would be more money for cystic fibrosis
research if the companies that donated food and stuff donated money
instead. But I also understand the need
for events to be fun and interesting so more people will participate. I guess what I learned, then, is that you
have to spend money to make money. I
also learned the importance of hiring people who know what they are doing. Professionalism is something that helps the
NGOs run smoothly and efficiently. I
never was very sure before if NGOs needed to have professionals on their
payroll, but I now believe it to be necessary.
I think that the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation seems to operate pretty well—their
events seem to go well anyways, and they provide good information on their
website. I can’t speak for all NGOs; I’m
sure some operate better than others.
5.
I doubt there is anyone in the public who would
say they don’t care about poverty, hunger, sickness, raising awareness, or fair
housing. But what they are willing to do
about it is the big thing. It’s so easy
to get wrapped up in your life and not think about greater social issues. I think it’s really important for groups like
the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and Habitat for Humanity to host events and
advertise, because it gets us to stop what we’re doing and think about social
problems for a minute. I felt that the
various volunteers we met during the event were pretty generous—they were
willing to give of their time to do something really repetitive like handing
out name-badges for hours at a time, or get up early on a Saturday to sing, or
walk up and down the stairs to find people that needed help. There were more people involved, generously
giving of their time, than I expected.
6.
I learned that when I do little things, it may
not feel like much, but it adds to all the other people doing little things to
make a big difference. I realized that
even though it often takes a lot of people working together to make something
big happen, my efforts are a valuable part of that. I think that groups have several advantages
in projects of this type: more people are exposed to the ideas and issues
involved, having people around as you work boosts morale, and you get more
accomplished. The main drawback of
working together is that it takes longer to come to a consensus on
methods. Lots of discussion happens, and
it takes a while for differing opinions to merge into a workable plan. The slow start is made up by increased
returns and greater motivation, though.
7.
The overall
value of a collective volunteer action such as the Cystic Fibrosis Fundraiser
and Climb or Habitat for Humanity is high.
Even if we can’t address every issue or affect every person in need, it’s
important for us to do what we can, and remember that we make a world of
difference to the individuals we do
help. Also, collective volunteer actions
help the volunteers as much as those they are trying to serve. I think engaging in volunteer work makes for
better people.
8.
I think that world issues have to be addressed at the local level. That is where ordinary citizens have the most
power to act, so it is where the greatest amount of people can be
involved. Policy-makers certainly have a
role, but I think that the average citizen doing average things is where people’s
minds and hearts are changed, and that is where real change starts. All these issues like poverty, hunger,
sickness, lack of housing—governments can help, but not without some changes in
society at large. That is where getting
involved at the local level—making it personal—makes a difference. Our attitudes will have to change before
governmental programs will be very effective.
We need to help the people around us, get our hands dirty, be our brother’s
keeper—all of that. The local level is
where we can form habits of service, and lots of individual habits can change a
society.
No comments:
Post a Comment